Our sixth table contains the means and variance scores for Question Three respondents to our second survey.
The Development of Coaches Survey: II. Challenge, Autonomy and Support
Home Research Coaching Surveys The Development of Coaches Survey: II. Challenge, Autonomy and Support
The Six Institutional Cultures: Summary Descriptions
This document provides two summary descriptions of six institutional cultures: (1) profess…-
The Six Institutional Cultures Inventory
A pdf copy of the copyrighted Six Institutional Cultures Inventory is available by clickin… -
Six Institutional Cultures and the Coaching Challenges
Those aligned with this culture tend to value the predictability of a value-based, face-to…
Load More Related Articles
-
Finding Essence in a VUCA-Plus World V: Action Steps Toward Establishing and Maintaining Trust
It is at this point that Essentials and Essence join hands. What are the Essential steps t… -
Finding Essence in a VUCA-Plus World IV: Trust, Optimization and Polarity Management
We are now ready to begin identifying ways in which to best manage polarities associated w… -
Finding Essence in a VUCA-Plus World III: Trust and Polarity Management
I describe the nature of a lens through which one can view Essence. In providing this more…
Load More By William Bergquist
-
Master Coaches Identify Hot Topics in Executive Coaching
The Library of Professional Coaching, in collaboration with choice, the magazine of profes… -
Global Coaching Survey from ICF
COACH PRACTITIONERS • Compared with 2015, the proportion of coach practitioners who identi… -
Development of Coaches: Update of Report Six–Does ICF Certification Make a Difference?
A pdf version of the sixth report from the Development of Coaches project is available on …
Load More In Coaching Surveys
One Comment
Check Also
Master Coaches Identify Hot Topics in Executive Coaching
The Library of Professional Coaching, in collaboration with choice, the magazine of profes…
Rey Carr
December 17, 2015 at 4:00 pm
The best part of this report of the results of these two surveys is the discussion of the concepts. Such discussion is valuable regardless of the reliability or validity of the results (or evidence).
Unfortunately, the methodology section is missing the most important aspect of methodology: how were each of the surveys distributed and what was the rate of return. If, as I suspect, this was an Internet-based survey, then the results have an exceptionally low chance of being either reliable or valid. That is, the likelihood that they reflect the “coaching industry” or “a typical coach” is incredibly small. Thus, conclusions based on the results are suspect.
But there’s the point. The discussion itself has its own reliability and validity independent of the survey. The points made are worthy of continuing discussion regardless of the surveys.