Question: Since you began formally working as a coach . . .
ICF Certified | Non-ICF Certified (Renegade) | T-Test
| P Level | |
How much have you changed overall as a coach? | Mean=4.20 Variance=0.71 | Mean=3.71 Variance =1.05 | t = 3.57 df = 210 | Significant <.01 CV=2.60 |
How much do you regard this as progress or improvement? | Mean=4.33 Variance=0.71 | Mean=4.36 Variance =0.83 | t = 0.57 df = 206 | >.05 |
How much do you regard this as a decline or impairment? | Mean=0.21 Variance=0.33 | Mean=0.17 Variance =0.37 | t = 0.38 df = 210 | >.05 |
How much have you succeeded in overcoming any past limitations in your coaching skills and knowledge? | Mean=3.99 Variance=0.73 | Mean=3.69 Variance =1.00 | t = 2.15 df = 208 | Significant <.05 CV=1.97 |
How much have you realized your potential as a coach? | Mean=3.85 Variance=1.13 | Mean=3.71 Variance =1.11 | t = 0.87 df =210 | >.05 |
Results from these two surveys suggest that those with formal ICF certification are more likely than the renegades to perceive themselves as changing overall as a coach since beginning their formal work as a coach. The difference is significant at the .01 level of confidence. In a similar vein, the ICF certified coaches are also more likely than the renegades to have perceived themselves as overcoming past limitations as a coach (in terms of their skills and knowledge). The difference in mean scores was recorded at the .05 level of confidence.
Download Article 1K Club
Rey Carr
December 30, 2016 at 9:07 pm
What a terrific paper! And I’m not saying that because my name is spelled correctly or my ideas are accurately presented. The distinction between internal/external locus of control, the renegades/certified distinction, and the frontier town analogy are all stimulating and thought-provoking ideas.