Home Concepts Adult Development Setting the Stage and Generativity One

Setting the Stage and Generativity One

62 min read
0
0
150

Perry suggests there is a fourth stage of cognitive flexibility that can produce even stronger and sustained motivation to enact generativity. He identifies this fourth stage as Commitment-in-relativism. At this stage, a generative person not only recognizes the value of alternative truths, value judgments, and moral compasses if they are coherently enacted within a specific community; they also possess a strong and sustained commitment to a specific set of truths, judgments and moral compasses of their own. They act upon these commitments rather than just supporting them or encouraging others who share their perspectives. It is this fourth stage that enables a full expression of deep caring. Again, generativity and deep caring is about actions and deeds–not just words and feelings.

There is one other important point to be made—a point that is often overlooked in the description of Perry’s four stages. In the process of shifting from one stage to a more “advanced” stage there is an attendant grieving which must be acknowledged and addressed. Each movement to the next stage is “being kicked out of Eden.” We lose our innocence about absolute truth and goodness. We are forced to take a stand even when competing interests and values pull us in multiple directions.

We mourn the loss and are inclined to move back to the previous stage (which is never really possible). Along comes a professional coach. This person can provide appreciation and support for this grieving process. They can help us live in this limbo state–Bill Bridge’s (1980; 2001) neutral zone–while we grow accustom to the new epistemological stance we have taken. It is with the assistance of a professional coach that we are likely to be successful in managing many stressful transitions. (Mura and Bergquist, 2020).

Commitment

One of our 100 Sage leaders sounded quite a bit like Michael Corleone regarding his Italian upbringing and his deep commitment to family. Unlike Michael, however, this man found that some of the traditional values and perspectives with which he grew-up were at odds with the values he was coming to embrace as an adult. The cognitive dissonance caused by this clash in values motivated him to embrace the newer values and set aside the older ones. This is the essence of commitment-in-relativism and sets the stage for generativity:

“As a young leader my style could have been characterized as explicit, external, assertive, confrontational, verbose, and earnest. There was this sense of needing to prove myself, to assure my worth or value, and to seek validation externally. I come from an Italian immigrant family, where many of these characteristics are cultural norms. However, I came to realize that while I was a rather effective young leader in terms of my tangible accomplishments, my leadership style often placed me at cross-purposes with my broader goal of fostering a more peaceful society. Because after all, I thought, if one cannot resolve conflicts and nurture peace in his or her own personal and professional interactions, how could one possibly believe in the attainment of global peace? That reflection helped me to evaluate and understand the role that I had played in creating or intensifying conflict, and it led me to a more self-disciplined approach to leadership—one that is still assertive but inclusive in reflecting more humility and compassion, and that allows more space for a diversity of opinions and perspectives. Sometimes, I find my old leadership qualities creeping into emotionally charged situations, but I now have the maturity to hold myself accountable for those transgressions without it affecting my overall sense of self-worth and effectiveness.”

A second Sage leader whom we interviewed similarly had to confront his dualistic beliefs and alter them:

“When I was younger, certainty was the source of my passion. That is, I believed that something was right or wrong. Today, when the feeling of certainty arises, I let it go because it creates a barrier to creativity and collaboration. Instead of certainty, I’ve cultivated a stronger attitude about curiosity, which is a much more expansive state of consciousness.”

Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Download Article 1K Club
Load More Related Articles
Load More By William Bergquist
Load More In Adult Development

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Generativity and the Deep Caring of Professional Coaching

The state of Generativity is important for coaching clients to appreciate and set forth as…